|
1
|
- Peter Wienand
- Partner, Farrer & Co
Chair, Museums Copyright Group
- National Maritime Museum, Greenwich
- 21 June 2005
|
|
2
|
- Increased interest
- Collections management
- Risk management
- Revenue generation
- Delivering strategic objectives
|
|
3
|
- Rights in objects in collections, especially copyright can affect or
restrict the fulfilment of the core mission
- Increasing quantities of material is copyright protected
- Reproduction and communication to the public of material – in some cases
even over 100 years old – is often not possible without getting
permission from the right-holder
- Acts permitted by law are of limited scope
- [Note: old unpublished material - if open to the public in a museum,
created before 1 August 1989, and author dead for at least 50 years –
but doesn’t apply to artistic works]
|
|
4
|
- Museums are increasingly involved in projects involving large-scale use
of third party IPR, some of it commissioned: for example, NOF-funded and
COL-funded projects, but also other publishing and educational
activities
- Museums do not benefit from exceptions to the same extent as libraries,
archives and schools
|
|
5
|
- IPR has been recognised for a while as a commercial asset that can be
put to work to make money – eg in picture library operations,
publishing, licensing – although care needs to be taken and there is a
risk management dimension here too
- Control is a key theme, to ensure that:
- third parties do not establish rights over the museum’s assets (eg
through photography of objects in the galleries)
- staff consultancy activity benefits the museum
- the museum secures ownership or usage rights in the product of museum
staff work
|
|
6
|
- General position at law: copyright in work created in course of
employment belongs to the employer, subject to contrary agreement. Importance of job description
- Position in museums: curators have in the past been allowed to retain
copyright and exploit it themselves
- Compare position in higher education - often seen as a ‘perk’ to
compensate for low salaries
- Unclear what rights the employer has to use the fruit of employees’
work, if any
|
|
7
|
- statement of objectives
- clarification of job description
- definition of categories of work covered
- procedures to deal with approaches by third parties
- dealings with the media
- ownership of IP
- use rights
- moral rights (crediting and editing)
- benefit-sharing
- conflicts of interest
- plagiarism
- best practice in commissioning external third party work
- acquisitions procedure
|
|
8
|
- Introduction of an IPR policy may well involve a change to previous
custom and practice
- Therefore a change to terms and conditions
- Consultation is essential
|